“Mr. Speaker, I have good news. Today, the Liberals have a chance to vote for our NDP bill to repeal section 107 and protect the right to strike. Unions and workers everywhere have supported it. The government has a clear choice, continue its unconstitutional attacks on workers in Bill C-39 or vote in favour of our NDP bill. Which is it? Will the Liberals finally respect the demands of workers or continue caving to CEOs by violating the right to strike?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 90 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 32%Reasoning 24%Promise 45%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 24 wordsobviously, we honour the role of workers, honour the role of organized labour and recognize that, in fact, there are rights to collectively bargain, Reasoning · 18 wordsbut sometimes those rights, in order to be exercised, need federal support, especially in Canada Labour Code situations.Promise · 34 wordsWe will, under Bill C-39, put in place new, expanded measures in order to support parties that find it difficult to achieve a collective agreement.1Vague promiseWe want to make those strikes all too rare.
