Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

Liberal on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-28

50 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Wade Grant (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, I too grew up in an era that did not have the Internet. All we had was a land line, which we used to phone our friends to talk to them. However, I am the father of two young children. My daughter is now 15, and, of course, she is exposed to things like social media. I have seen things that I have never had to deal with. I wish I could protect her 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but unfortunately we cannot do that. The member talked about protecting children. I have heard it from a lot of parents. He has probably heard it from a lot of parents. Can he expand on how he feels this bill would protect them going forward?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 98 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Thanks 8%Claims 60%Reasoning 32%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 4 wordsI appreciate the question, ThanksClaims · 30 wordsbecause it is important to recognize that Bill C-34 would create the digital safety act.¹ It would regulate major social media services, AI chat services and some other online services.² Reasoning · 16 wordsThrough those regulations, we would have the opportunity to have them enforced by the safety commission.³

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 91

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “I appreciate the question,”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Bill C-34 would create the digital safety act”Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, would create the digital safety act.search
2“regulate major social media services, AI chat services and some other online services”The digital safety act created by Bill C-34 would regulate major social media services, AI chat services and some other online services.search
3“enforced by the safety commission”Regulations made under the digital safety act in Bill C-34 would be enforced by the safety commission.search

Analysed on 2026-10-30