Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Ben Carr

184 words · 9 sentences · 12 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, one of the things that give the legislation teeth is the proposed digital safety commission that would have the power to give fines and make sure the regulations are in fact being enforced in many different ways. I am wondering if my colleague could provide his thoughts on the importance of having a commission, because it would actually provide action.”
Statement grade
C+
66 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 79%Positioning 3%Reasoning 18%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 41 wordsone thing the Province of Manitoba has done that I am fully supportive of is that it has created a body that can oversee disciplinary measures for educators.1Partly on point The person who heads that up goes by the name of Noni Classen.2 Positioning · 5 wordsWhere did she come from?Positioning Claims · 36 wordsShe came from the Canadian Centre for Child Protection.3Off point The whole reason the disciplinary board exists is for there to be accountability and for there to be real consequences when inappropriate or unacceptable actions are taken. Reasoning · 33 wordsI see this as no different. It is about protecting young people. However, if it is going to work, it has to be created in a way that ensures that there are consequences. Claims · 69 wordsI have full confidence, based on the way the legislation is currently written, Unearned certaintyand I am sure as the legislation will be strengthened throughout the legislative process, that we will land at a place that will ensure that if a social media company or other online platform is not abiding by the law, as it is written in Bill C-34, they would have a price to pay for that.Partly on point

Analysed on