Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Michelle Rempel Garner

Conservative on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-28

62 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)

“Madam Speaker, does the member, in principle, support the need to have a commission that would be able to ensure there are fines and that there is a higher sense of accountability on the Internet to protect the children of Canada?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 96 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 15%Claims 63%The ask 11%Reasoning 11%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Procedure · 9 wordsI am just going to look at the bill.Procedure Claims · 30 wordsThe proposed commission would have sweeping powers with little accountability. It would serve as a super-regulator. It would act as rule-maker, investigator, enforcer and prosecutor, ¹and have hearings in secret.² The ask · 7 wordsI want to know what that means, Reasoning · 7 wordsand it deserves a lot of scrutiny. Claims · 9 wordsThe government should have put that in the bill.

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 83

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I am just going to look at the bill.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“rule-maker, investigator, enforcer and prosecutor”Bill C-34’s proposed Digital Safety Commission would act as rule-maker, investigator, enforcer and prosecutor.search
2“have hearings in secret”Bill C-34’s proposed Digital Safety Commission would hold hearings in secret.search

Analysed on 2026-10-30