Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Grant Jackson

Conservative on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-28

65 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)

“Madam Speaker, it seems that Conservative Party members are talking about the problem. We have a good understanding of the problem. That is why we have Bill C-34. It is there to protect the interests of children in Canada. Does the member support the principle of having the legislation go to committee?”

Statement grade

Average 91 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Greeting 14%Reasoning 66%Procedure 12%Anecdote 8%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Greeting · 9 wordsI think I made that clear in my speech.Greeting Reasoning · 43 wordsIf the member for Winnipeg North was not listening, yes, I absolutely recognize the problem and support, in principle, addressing the serious problem of the kids’ mental health crisis online and the problem of social media companies exploiting kids through their exploitative algorithms. Procedure · 8 wordsThat is an answer to the member’s question.Procedure Anecdote · 5 wordsHe is shaking his head.Anecdote

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 63

3 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Greetings and pleasantries.What the tags mean “I think I made that clear in my speech.”A greeting: no claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “That is an answer to the member’s question.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
A story that illustrates instead of making a point.What the tags mean “He is shaking his head.”An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-30