← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little. Not graded
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
69 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Reasoning
93 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
56 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Promise 84% Reasoning 16%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Promise · 41 words I think what we need to do is sit down as parliamentarians in committee, go over the bill line by line, and find ways that we can ensure that these tech companies become responsible and are accountable to protect our children. Vague promise Reasoning · 8 words Without our children, this country has no future. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×2 Vague promise
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 69
2 of 3 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and find ways that we can ensure that these tech companies become responsible and are accountable to protect our children.” About the goal of holding tech companies accountable, not whether the bill as it stands would prevent the harm or how much is known about it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Without our children, this country has no future.” A general remark on the importance of children, not on the bill’s effects or how much is known about it.
Reasoning · 93
0 of 3 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Nothing lost points.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “I think what we need to do is sit down as parliamentarians in committee, go over the bill line by line,”
Because “and find ways that we can ensure that these tech companies become responsible and are accountable to protect our children.”
Conclusion “and find ways that we can ensure that these tech companies become responsible and are accountable to protect our children.”
Because “I think what we need to do is sit down as parliamentarians in committee, go over the bill line by line,”
Respect · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 56
1 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “find ways that we can ensure” The commitment names no measure, date or success condition, only an open-ended search for ways.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
