Analysis · Reply to a comment · beta

Anna Roberts

Conservative on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-28

80 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Michael Coteau (Liberal)

“Madam Speaker, I am a bit confused by both members opposite who spoke on the issues. We have a slew of different bills. We have Bill C-36, we passed Bill C-16, we have Bill C-25, and of course there is Bill C-34, which we are debating today. This a series of bills that really look for ways to protect Canadians when it comes to young people and when it comes to all Canadians. These four bills really look for ways to protect Canadians. I was hoping the member could reflect on any of those bills to see if they align with anything that she has mentioned today and if there is support for any of those four bills that I just mentioned.”

Statement grade

B–

73 / 100, held down by Clarity

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 29%The question 18%Reasoning 54%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 6 wordsI know the Scarborough area well.Off point The question · 14 wordsI would ask the member how he would explain that to Amanda Todd’s mother. Claims · 17 wordsAmanda Todd’s mother right now is grieving the loss of her daughter.¹ We could protect those children, Reasoning · 43 wordsbut we have a responsibility as parliamentarians and as parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, mothers and fathers to work to ensure that these tech companies become just as accountable as parents if we want the future of this country to continue to be prosperous.Vague promise

At a glance

Lost points for
VagueMuch of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 91

1 of 2 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the comment put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “I know the Scarborough area well.”About her familiarity with a riding, not the bills or the question of support for them.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 43

1 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “to work to ensure that these tech companies become just as accountable”The commitment names no measure, date or success condition for making the companies accountable.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Amanda Todd’s mother right now is grieving the loss of her daughter”Amanda Todd, a Canadian teenager, has died, and her mother is grieving her loss.search

Analysed on 2026-10-30