Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba

Liberal on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-28

82 words · 5 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, my colleague said that he spoke with constituents in his riding. Can he tell us more about the response from parents? What feedback did he receive in those discussions?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 82 wordsthat was the first event I held in my riding this year in relation to the two bills.¹ I am talking about Bill C‑36 and Bill C‑34.² I was surprised by the response I received from my constituents when I launched the call to consult the people of Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie.³ The response from parents was overwhelming. I even had some other local elected officials show up to share their point of view and explain why it is important to quickly implement these bills.⁴

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the first event I held in my riding this year in relation to the two bills”The member for Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie held his first event of 2026 in his riding relating to Bills C-36 and C-34.search
2“I am talking about Bill C‑36 and Bill C‑34.”Bill C-36 and Bill C-34 are the two bills the member’s consultation concerned.search
3“launched the call to consult the people of Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie”The member launched a public consultation of the people of Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie on the two bills.search
4“some other local elected officials show up”Some local elected officials attended the member’s consultation event in Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie.search

Analysed on 2026-10-30