Analysis · Debate reply · beta

William Stevenson

61 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, throughout the evening, we heard all of our colleagues talk about a common goal: We all want to better protect children online, on both sides of the House. Some members felt that some aspects of the bill could be improved, but I think we all agree on the objective of Bill C-34. If we agree on the objective, which is to better protect children online, I would like my colleague to tell us clearly whether he plans to vote in favour of Bill C-34 at second reading in order to refer it to committee.”
Statement grade
A+
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 41%Promise 59%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 25 wordsI think the intent and the goals are agreed to by everybody in Parliament. There are a lot of questions that are still left unanswered, Promise · 36 wordsand I do believe we will want this bill to go to committee to answer those questions and develop what is missing. I am fully supportive of it going to committee to get those questions answered.

Analysed on