Analysis · Debate reply · beta

William Stevenson

Conservative on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-28

43 words · 3 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, my colleague said that the bill has room for improvement, but he also said that he wants it to be passed at second reading so it can go to committee. What worthwhile improvements does he see in the bill? If he intends to support it at second reading, then he must believe it contains positive measures.”

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 30%Reasoning 70%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 13 wordswith regard to positive things, it is addressing the concerns of many parents. Reasoning · 30 wordsWe need to give them some of the tools. We need to make sure the legislation is appropriate and proportionate to what the goals are to help parents going forward.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 48

3 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “with regard to positive things, it is addressing the concerns of many parents.”It praises the bill’s general aim for parents but names none of the improvements asked for.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We need to give them some of the tools.”It speaks of needing to give parents tools, not the specific improvements in the bill the question asked for.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We need to make sure the legislation is appropriate and proportionate to what the goals are to help parents going forward.”It states the legislation should be proportionate to its goals without identifying any worthwhile improvement.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-30