Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Mike Lake

103 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Rachael Thomas (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his passionate speech and the incredible work he has done on this file over years, if not a decade, as a member of Parliament. Bill C-34 does not outline the types of design features that should be put in place by platforms in order to keep kids safe. That is going to be determined later on. Given the member’s tremendous amount of research and expertise in this area, I wonder if there are two or three design features he would hope to see come out of the regulatory framework that would be created.”
Statement grade
A+
Average 96 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 72%Positioning 11%Reasoning 17%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 40 wordswhen we take a look at the different design features, such as infinite scroll, one of the conversations we need to have, 1and this is broader than just children, is on some transparency around why we see what we see.2 Positioning · 11 wordsI think, for all of us, that is a huge issue.Positioning Claims · 34 wordsWe just take what is given to us and go on to the next thing, and we do not know why we are seeing what we see. Some transparency around that is tremendously important. Reasoning · 18 wordsAgain, this will probably be one of the key things that the committee looks at from witnesses who—

Analysed on