Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau

Bloc Québécois on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-29

73 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Marianne Dandurand (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, I truly appreciated the speech by my colleague from Laurentides—Labelle. I must acknowledge that the Bloc Québécois has consistently advocated strong measures to combat cyber-bullying and threats of all kinds directed at children. Those are values we share. In the case of this bill, many of its provisions are aimed at preventing the commission and perpetuation of criminal offences. I want to know whether my colleague agrees that prevention should be one of the main objectives of a bill like this one.”

Statement grade

Average 94 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 10%Reasoning 90%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordswhat a great question from my colleague.Procedure Reasoning · 66 wordsI come from the community sector, a sector that is stretched thin in Quebec, Partly on pointand I know that prevention is key. Indeed, when we see the strategies being used by platforms that turn young people into zombies, we understand that safeguards need to be implemented. We need to invest more and develop a legislative framework that protects the physical and mental health of our young people.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 88

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “what a great question from my colleague.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 87

1 of 2 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “I come from the community sector, a sector that is stretched thin in Quebec,”The clause provides background context from her professional experience but does not directly answer the question about prevention.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-31