Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Abdelhaq Sari

Liberal on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-29

119 words · 9 sentences · 10 clauses

Replying to Peter Schiefke (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for his speech and the extraordinary work he does to serve his constituents. I would ask my colleague to tell the House and the parents and young people in his riding why it is important for us to adopt Bill C-34. What will this do to better protect Canadians, especially young Canadians?”

Statement grade

A–

Average 85 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Thanks 12%Procedure 3%Claims 48%Reasoning 37%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 14 wordsI thank my colleague, who represents the riding neighbouring mine, for that great question.Thanks Procedure · 4 wordsIt is very simple.Procedure Claims · 41 wordsAs I mentioned, I have a 14-year-old son.Partly on point We know full well that when a toy is dangerous, it is taken off the market and off of store shelves.Unearned certainty My son spends most of his time in front of a screen.Partly on point Reasoning · 38 wordsI think we need to address this issue much more seriously. I cannot ask parents in Bourassa and across Canada to monitor their children’s online activities 24 hours a day, seven days a week. That is virtually impossible. Claims · 16 wordsHowever, the platforms have the means to do so, they have the algorithms to do so, Reasoning · 6 wordsand they must do just that.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 80

2 of 5 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “I thank my colleague, who represents the riding neighbouring mine, for that great question.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “It is very simple.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 87

2 of 5 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “As I mentioned, I have a 14-year-old son.”About the speaker’s own son, setting up his concern rather than addressing the bill’s adoption.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “My son spends most of his time in front of a screen.”About his son’s screen time, not what the bill would do.

Respect · 100

0 of 5 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 74

1 of 5 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.What the tags mean “We know full well”Asserts shared knowledge as self-evident rather than pointing to any source.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-31