Replying to Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc Québécois). The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the bill.
“Mr. Speaker, I want congratulate my hon. colleague on her speech. It was very substantive. Of course, I am sorry that she had to endure so much harassment on social media. That is truly unacceptable. At the end of her speech, she touched on several of the concerns that have been raised during this debate, including respect for areas of provincial jurisdiction, respect for Quebec and the provinces and, for example, flexibility regarding age. In her view, does the bill, in its current form, provide sufficient flexibility? If, as she said, amendments were proposed during the committee study, would her party be open to improving the bill in this regard?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 62%Promise 38%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 20 wordsI am not sufficiently familiar with the situation in Quebec.I believe that Quebec has more experience with this issue, PositioningPromise · 12 wordsand I would be very pleased to see amendments tabled in committee.
