Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Marilyn Gladu

43 words · 3 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Elizabeth May (Green)
“Mr. Speaker, I respect enormously the fact that the member is an engineer. I am a lawyer. I look at this bill and ask why we do not tighten it to create a real incentive for tech giants to live up to the duty to protect our children, enforceable by law. By attaching that duty specifically to the directors of the companies, they would feel a real incentive to avoid ending up with strict liability and going to jail if a child in Canada is harmed. I want to put forward amendments to that effect when we get to committee. I will vote for the bill to get to committee. We need to tackle this. I wonder if she has any thoughts on the idea of tightening up the punishments.”
Statement grade
–
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 43 wordsas an engineer, I am very detail-oriented in general.1Partly on point I would say the more detail we can put in the bill and not leave to regulators or bureaucrats, the better.2 I look forward to the amendments the member opposite will bring to committee.3Positioning

Analysed on