Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Gary Anandasangaree

Liberal on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2026-10-29

64 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Fred Davies (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, we are sitting in an immigration system that has over 30,000 people who want to come to Canada under the start-up visa program and are stuck in bureaucratic purgatory. That is not progress. That is a failure of our system. On the flip side, today’s national security strategy is a nothingburger and fails to address the serious screening problems for non-citizens seeking entry to Canada. The CBSA had 675 reports seeking deportation on national security grounds, but only 44 people were actually removed. This is a disaster, so will the Liberals reduce immigration levels—”

Statement grade

C+

Average 68 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 39%Claims 23%Promise 38%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 7 wordsthis is a historic day for Canada.PositioningOff point Claims · 15 wordsWe released a national security strategy that encompasses an all-of-government approach toward strategic national security. Promise · 24 wordsWe will, in the coming weeks and months, release specific strategies toward public safety, Vague promiseas well as intelligence, defence, the economy and foreign policy. Positioning · 18 wordsThis is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for us to ensure that we have a strategic view of national security.PositioningPartly on point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 56

2 of 8 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “this is a historic day for Canada.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for us to ensure that we have a strategic view of national security.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 41

5 of 8 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “this is a historic day for Canada.”This statement offers a generic positive declaration without addressing the immigration or security issues.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We released a national security strategy that encompasses an all-of-government approach toward strategic national security.”On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We will, in the coming weeks and months, release specific strategies toward public safety,”On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “as well as intelligence, defence, the economy and foreign policy.”On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for us to ensure that we have a strategic view of national security.”On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.

Respect · 100

0 of 8 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 74

1 of 8 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “release specific strategies toward public safety”The commitment does not specify the content or defined measures of the strategies to be released.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-31