Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Gary Anandasangaree

51 words · 3 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Michelle Rempel Garner (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, the strategy the minister mentioned could have been an email. It was very slim, and it said nothing about one of Canada’s biggest security issues, which is the failure to screen people who are coming into the country. Now the Prime Minister wants to increase immigration levels. CSIS screening requests hit a record 538,000 in 2024, and permanent residency files for full security screening are now projected to take years to clear. Why does this national security strategy say nothing about these things?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 33%Promise 49%Reasoning 18%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 17 wordsthe national security strategy is all-encompassing and has many elements of what my friend opposite is seeking. Promise · 25 wordsI can assure her that as part of the public safety portfolio, we are working toward finalizing a more comprehensive response that includes security screening.Vague promise Reasoning · 9 wordsIt is an essential part of keeping Canadians safe.

Analysed on