← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 93 / 100
Signal
78 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 17% Claims 55% The ask 20% The question 9%
Structure · 7 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 1 words actually, Procedure Claims · 19 words if I hit Ctrl+F on that document, I cannot find anything about improved security screening for non-citizens entering Canada.1 Procedure · 16 words I would refer him to that document, and I would also refer him to the results. Procedure Claims · 37 words When Ahmed Eldidi entered Canada, he was allowed to do so in spite of the fact that there was a video circulating that showed him essentially committing an ISIS-level crime.3 He was convicted of a crime afterward, 4 The ask · 20 words and the Persian community now wants clear public screening criteria that distinguishes forced conscripts from senior officials and terrorist leaders.2 The question · 9 words Why did this strategy not do any of that?
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×3
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 78
3 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “actually,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I would refer him to that document,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “and I would also refer him to the results.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “if I hit Ctrl+F on that document, I cannot find anything about improved security screening for non-citizens entering Canada.” The speaker claims that the document does not contain any information regarding improved security screening for non-citizens entering Canada. search 2 “the Persian community now wants clear public screening criteria that distinguishes forced conscripts from senior officials and terrorist leaders.” The Persian community demands clear public screening criteria to distinguish between forced conscripts, senior officials, and terrorist leaders. search 3 “When Ahmed Eldidi entered Canada, he was allowed to do so in spite of the fact that there was a video circulating that showed him essentially committing an ISIS-level crime.” Ahmed Eldidi was permitted to enter Canada despite a circulating video showing him committing a crime. search 4 “He was convicted of a crime afterward,” Ahmed Eldidi was convicted of a crime after entering Canada. search