“Mr. Speaker, having government appointees appear before committee is standard practice. The Liberals made the unusual decision to appoint the Prime Minister’s wife to this role. That should mean more transparency, not less. Lobbyists and special interest groups are celebrating that they have access to the Prime Minister’s wife, and $1.2 billion is not a small amount of money. Canadians deserve to know what her responsibilities are, what authority she has and how their money is being spent. What do the Liberals have to hide by blocking her appearance?”
Statement grade
F
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 75. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance.
30 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
The question 50%Reasoning 28%Claims 12%The ask 10%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, The question · 25 wordswhat I would like to know in terms of accountability is where the member was when we announced $70 billion of investment at Churchill Falls, 1Reasoning · 14 wordswhich is going to put Newfoundlanders and Labradorians to work for the next generation.Claims · 6 wordsShe was nowhere to be found.2The ask · 5 wordsLet us have accountability, please.Off point
