Analysis · Debate reply · beta

John Brassard

Conservative on Safe Social Media Act 2026-10-29

45 words · 2 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Leslyn Lewis (Conservative)

“Madam Speaker, there are many parents who have reached out to a number of MPs. They are very concerned about their ability to protect their children, and they are asking for additional assistance. Does the member believe that there is a way to balance the rights of individual freedoms so that people are not unfairly targeted for lawful conduct online while parents can be given the tools to protect their children without government intervention?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 97 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Reasoning 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Reasoning · 45 wordsthat is the fine balance we have to find. It is about protecting children, which we all want, and then protecting law-abiding people who are expressing their views from a knock on the door by the police telling them they have expressed themselves too much—

At a glance

AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Reasoning · 87

Nothing lost points on Reasoning.

Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.

Conclusions found · 1

Conclusion“that is the fine balance we have to find.”

Because“It is about protecting children,”

“and then protecting law-abiding people who are expressing their views from a knock on the door by the police telling them they have expressed themselves too much—”

Reason given

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-31