“Madam Speaker, as I said earlier during my question, the Standing Committee on the Status of Women is studying similar issues, and the issue here is not a simple one. It concerns youth and education. These are matters under the jurisdiction of Quebec and the provinces. The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage warned the government against the temptation to act alone. As proof, it even made a recommendation to that effect: That the Government of Canada, in addressing the effects of influencers and social media on children and adolescents—and while recognizing the jurisdiction and primacy of the provinces in matters relating to social services and youth protection—adopt an asymmetrical and flexible approach. Why is the government showing up with a bill without having consulted Quebec or the provinces at all, it seems, on an issue that they will eventually have to work and collaborate on together?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 41%Promise 39%Reasoning 20%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Claims · 17 wordsthis legislative effort is being led by the federal government in co-operation with the provinces and territories.1Promise · 16 wordsThe provinces and territories, along with all levels of society, will have a role to play, 2Vague promiseReasoning · 8 wordsbut with the support provided by this legislation.3Partly on point
