“Mr. Speaker, I want to be kind. The blue seal program the Conservative Party talks about, at the national level, is just not real. I think there are some people within the Conservative Party who understand that. Maybe some do not. I used to be the health care critic for the Province of Manitoba. The issue of doctors and the placement of doctors, and so forth, is the responsibility of provinces. The biggest barrier in terms of recognizing doctors is not a federal initiative. Often a federal government can encourage and promote provinces to get doctors recognized. It saddens me when doctors or potential doctors are leaving the province of Manitoba and going to other jurisdictions, even countries such as Australia, where they become doctors but then come back and are not getting recognized. This is a serious issue. The federal government is doing what it can to promote and encourage things such as mobility across Canada. We need more of that. We need our health care professionals to get better recognition for the skill sets they have. I remember an incident when I went to a furniture store on St. James Street. This happened when I was the health care critic. The province was actually busing pregnant women from Brandon, I believe it was, to the city of Winnipeg because we did not have enough doctors in Brandon to deliver babies. Meanwhile, the guy who was selling me furniture had delivered babies in India for years. He gave me the impression that it was hundreds of babies. He could not get his credentials recognized in Canada. The provinces play a critical role in the numbers of doctors. The stakeholders we are talking about deal with universities, our professional organizations and provincial governments, working more closely at resolving the issues, such as residency positions in hospitals, and, again, educational facilities. From a federal government perspective, we not only have had a Prime Minister who has actually made a commitment to preserving the strength of our health care system from a federal perspective, but we are also doing more. To give a specific example, we have now put aside $5 billion for capital health care expansions. For the first time, we are saying that we are going to give x number of dollars for capital so we can get capital expansion strictly with health care. I, for one, am hoping for things such as some money going toward expanding the number of beds at the Seven Oaks General Hospital. I would like more money invested in research and health care, in particular cancer research out of the Health Sciences Centre. There are incredible people who work there. The federal government is stepping up. The federal government has stepped up in the past to deal with things such as palliative care and mental health. Yes, we have the Canada Health Act. It is important that we look at ways in which we can support our—”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 91 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 29%Claims 55%The question 16%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 28 wordsthe response from the government side shows just how out of touch it is with rural and aging communities and with seniors.The Liberals offer more empty promises, PositioningClaims · 41 wordsand they refuse to answer for the unaccredited medical doctors they brought to Canada, promising them that they would be able to work.1Many are from Canada, doctors sitting on the sidelines while our health care system grinds to a halt.Positioning · 10 wordsResidents in my riding are not asking for grand lectures.PositioningClaims · 30 wordsThey are asking for an ER clinic they can rely on and a specialist who can see them when they are sick.Too many physicians are sitting on the sidelines.The question · 21 wordsWhy will the government not adopt our plan to take immediate action to put them into hospitals when they are needed?