← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity is 86. The grade is held to 74, 30 above Signal. 74 / 100, held down by Signal
Signal
44 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 44% Positioning 51% The question 5%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 40 words the job cuts at Parks Canada will transform our protected areas.1 Imagine no longer having park wardens in the Mingan Archipelago.2 The closest ones will be 650 kilometres away.3 No one will be there to protect nature or stop poaching. Positioning · 46 words Our hearts go out to the workers who are devastated by this news. They deserve transparency and time, not the Prime Minister’s bulldozer. The government needs to stop taking this penny-wise and pound-foolish approach, just to save a few bucks on the backs of these folks. Positioning The question · 5 words Will he stop this injustice?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×3 Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points. Reasons given This statement drew 3 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 44
3 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Our hearts go out to the workers who are devastated by this news.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They deserve transparency and time, not the Prime Minister’s bulldozer.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The government needs to stop taking this penny-wise and pound-foolish approach, just to save a few bucks on the backs of these folks.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Nothing lost points.
Conclusions found · 3
Conclusion “the job cuts at Parks Canada will transform our protected areas.”
Because “Imagine no longer having park wardens in the Mingan Archipelago.”
“The closest ones will be 650 kilometres away.”
“No one will be there to protect nature or stop poaching.”
Conclusion “They deserve transparency and time, not the Prime Minister’s bulldozer.”
Because “The government needs to stop taking this penny-wise and pound-foolish approach, just to save a few bucks on the backs of these folks.”
Conclusion “The government needs to stop taking this penny-wise and pound-foolish approach, just to save a few bucks on the backs of these folks.”
Because “the job cuts at Parks Canada will transform our protected areas.”
“Imagine no longer having park wardens in the Mingan Archipelago.”
“The closest ones will be 650 kilometres away.”
“No one will be there to protect nature or stop poaching.”
Respect · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the job cuts at Parks Canada” Parks Canada is cutting jobs. search 2 “no longer having park wardens in the Mingan Archipelago” Parks Canada job cuts would result in no park wardens being stationed in the Mingan Archipelago. search 3 “The closest ones will be 650 kilometres away” The closest park wardens to the Mingan Archipelago would be 650 kilometres away. search
