← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 71. The grade is held to 63, 30 above Relevance. 63 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
50 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
33 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 22% Claims 59% Procedure 3% Aside 5% Thanks 11%
Structure · 10 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 35 words I was just talking about empathy. Some issues are painful and resonate differently with each and every one of us. We need to be open to others and to the many different stories we encounter. Positioning Off point Claims · 26 words I have often heard the issue framed in terms of access to health care. I would not want that expression to be reduced to a caricature. Partly on point Procedure · 6 words We see it in our society: Procedure Claims · 42 words There is a hierarchy of suffering. Physical suffering is recognized, but when it comes to psychological suffering, people question whether it is real, even if they may have legitimate reasons for doing so. We do not have access to another person’s thoughts. Partly on point Aside · 11 words In fact, I certainly hope no one has access to mine. Aside Off point Claims · 25 words We cannot see inside a person’s mind, 1 and that can indeed make things difficult. It is not something tangible. We are dealing with something intangible. Partly on point Positioning · 13 words Sometimes, we find it hard to understand. Off point Nevertheless, these debates need to happen. Positioning Claims · 36 words We are not talking here about someone in crisis. The health care system takes charge of people in crisis. A person cannot request medical assistance in dying while in crisis or while in need of services.2 Partly on point Thanks · 23 words However, I agree with my colleague that we need to have this discussion in order to help the people who can be helped. Thanks
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×14 Positioning ×5 Off point ×5 Procedure Aside Thanks Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 50
8 of 27 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I was just talking about empathy.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Some issues are painful and resonate differently with each and every one of us.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We need to be open to others and to the many different stories we encounter.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “We see it in our society:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “In fact, I certainly hope no one has access to mine.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Sometimes, we find it hard to understand.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Nevertheless, these debates need to happen.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “However, I agree with my colleague that we need to have this discussion in order to help the people who can be helped.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 33
19 of 27 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I was just talking about empathy.” This is a general statement about empathy and does not address the readiness of mental health services.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Some issues are painful and resonate differently with each and every one of us.” This is a general observation about the subjective nature of suffering.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We need to be open to others and to the many different stories we encounter.” This is a general call for open communication.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I have often heard the issue framed in terms of access to health care.” This acknowledges the issue being discussed but does not address the shortage of healthcare services.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I would not want that expression to be reduced to a caricature.” This engages with the way the problem is framed without directly addressing the readiness of the system.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “There is a hierarchy of suffering.” This presents a philosophical concept about suffering related to the debate but does not address system readiness.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Physical suffering is recognized,” This engages with the topic of suffering relevant to MAID but avoids the question of service availability.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “but when it comes to psychological suffering, people question whether it is real, even if they may have legitimate reasons for doing so.” This addresses the skepticism regarding psychological suffering, which is central to the debate, but does not answer the question of system capacity.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We do not have access to another person’s thoughts.” This speaks to the intangible nature of mental illness, which is the focus of the debate, but not the system’s capacity to handle it.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In fact, I certainly hope no one has access to mine.” This is a personal and tangential comment about the speaker’s own experiences.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We cannot see inside a person’s mind,” This reinforces the idea that mental illness is internal and unobservable, relating to the core topic.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and that can indeed make things difficult.” This reinforces the difficulty in assessing the issue, relevant to the debate but not the specific question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It is not something tangible.” This repeats the argument that mental distress is not tangible, which is relevant to the philosophical debate over MAID.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are dealing with something intangible.” This is a general statement about the nature of the issue.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Sometimes, we find it hard to understand.” This is a general comment about understanding which is not relevant to the system’s readiness.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Nevertheless, these debates need to happen.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are not talking here about someone in crisis.” This sets a boundary for when MAID can be requested, which relates to the safeguards discussed in the debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The health care system takes charge of people in crisis.” This states the role of the health care system in crisis, connecting back to the topic of care.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “A person cannot request medical assistance in dying while in crisis or while in need of services.” This clarifies a safeguard regarding when a request can be made, relating to the conditions of MAID.
Respect · 100
0 of 27 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 27 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “We cannot see inside a person’s mind” Psychological suffering is an intangible state that cannot be seen inside a person’s mind. search 2 “A person cannot request medical assistance in dying while in crisis or while in need of services.” According to the Medical Assistance in Dying Safeguards Act, a person cannot request medical assistance in dying while in crisis or while in need of services. search
