Discussion · Government Orders
Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Québécois
“In committee, I asked us to study Quebec's model of a special court for misconduct. The Liberals wasted time and blocked the whole meeting so we could not talk about it.”
“Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, aside from him saying shame on me. It is okay, I will sleep soundly, better than he will, I suspect. Let us forget the principle of the amendments. In his last response, the member asked our colleague to listen to what was said at the standing committee. I thought that was funny, because I was there but he was not. He was in the House, as usual. He probably spends Christmas here. That said, something that came up often was the Quebec model of a specialized court to deal with misconduct. I moved a motion that was unrelated to the bill but that asked whether, in the long term, we could consider this, look at it and assess this option. The Liberals filibustered for the entire meeting. Is that how they feel about institutions?”
-
Question or comment in debate
Signal 35 of 100
Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
See full analysis
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, aside from him saying shame on me. It is okay, I will sleep soundly, better than he will, I suspect. Let us forget the principle of the amendments. In his last response, the member asked our colleague to listen to what was said at the standing committee. I thought that was funny, because I was there but he was not. He was in the House, as usual. He probably spends Christmas here. That said, something that came up often was the Quebec model of a specialized court to deal with misconduct. I moved a motion that was unrelated to the bill but that asked whether, in the long term, we could consider this, look at it and assess this option. The Liberals filibustered for the entire meeting. Is that how they feel about institutions?