Discussion · Government Orders

Jeff Kibble Conservative

“Things have changed since the Arbour report. Military members now have better support, like independent legal help. Why does the government only talk about that report instead of other reviews that support giving victims a choice?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her thoughtful and heartfelt words. We may hear the party opposite continually refer to the Arbour report, yet much has changed since then, such as the mandatory duty to report and access to the SMSRC. Military members at that time did not have access to victim liaison services or independent legal support. I was wondering if my colleague could explain why the party opposite continues to refer to the report of Justice Arbour’s, who did not testify at committee, and has failed to refer to the Deschamps and Fish reports, which supported that choice for military sexual trauma.

No comments yet.

Comment rules