Discussion · Government Orders
Dan Albas Conservative
“This bill does not require the government to consult our national security agencies before approving space launches. The United Kingdom requires this. This gap puts Canada's security at risk.”
“Madam Speaker, the member for Winnipeg North mentioned his admiration for what the U.K. has done, in terms of its space program. In fact, the outer space program act of 1986 established very clearly under the U.K. model that the licensing authority must be satisfied that an activity will not impact national security. There is no statutory duty to consult DND or CSIS in Bill C-28 and no defined national security clearance. This completely contrasts with what the U.K. has. Does this member realize that there is a real existing gap that puts us at risk, compared to our G7 partners?”
Official Hansard
Madam Speaker, the member for Winnipeg North mentioned his admiration for what the U.K. has done, in terms of its space program. In fact, the outer space program act of 1986 established very clearly under the U.K. model that the licensing authority must be satisfied that an activity will not impact national security. There is no statutory duty to consult DND or CSIS in Bill C-28 and no defined national security clearance. This completely contrasts with what the U.K. has. Does this member realize that there is a real existing gap that puts us at risk, compared to our G7 partners?