Discussion · Oral Questions
Rebecca Alty Liberal
“We want to protect private property rights. We disagree with the B.C. Supreme Court's ruling, so we appealed it. We will handle this issue in court, not in the House of Commons, while we continue our work on reconciliation.”
“Mr. Speaker, preserving the certainty and stability of private property is of the utmost importance. That is why we advance all viable legal arguments to protect private property. We disagree with the B.C. Supreme Court’s ruling and that is why we appealed it back in September. We are fully committed to ensuring stability, certainty and confidence for Canadians who own property while we advance reconciliation. We will continue to pursue this matter where it belongs: in the courts and not on the floor of the House of Commons.”
-
Government answer in Question Period
Relevance 45 of 100
None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
See full analysis -
A repeated line
“We disagree with the B.C. Supreme Court's ruling.”
Said 5 times by 3 members since April 24.
Every time it was said
Mr. Speaker, preserving the certainty and stability of private property is of the utmost importance. That is why we advance all viable legal arguments to protect private property. We disagree with the B.C. Supreme Court’s ruling and that is why we appealed it back in September. We are fully committed to ensuring stability, certainty and confidence for Canadians who own property while we advance reconciliation. We will continue to pursue this matter where it belongs: in the courts and not on the floor of the House of Commons.