Discussion · Government Orders

Rebecca Alty Liberal

“The agreement with the Musqueam is just a plan for future talks. The Conservatives want every agreement to protect private property. We only include private property when the agreement is actually about private property.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, with respect to the last point regarding the Musqueam agreement, it is an incremental rights and recognition agreement. If folks are interested, they can go to the website and there is a description of what an MOU is and what a framework agreement is. We are currently at the framework agreement. Back in 2017, we signed the MOU with Musqueam. It took nine years to come to the framework agreement. It outlines the next steps for discussion. The other two agreements that were signed were about marine stewardship and the fisheries. The motion the Conservatives are proposing says we have not included private property in every agreement. I ask the Conservatives why we would include that in every agreement, including the education agreements, the health agreements and the self-government agreements. When an agreement does not touch on private property, we do not include it, because it does not touch on private property.

No comments yet.

Comment rules