Discussion · Government Orders
Ernie Klassen Liberal
“Our government protects private property rights. We disagreed with the court decision in British Columbia, so we appealed it. This issue belongs in court, not in political arguments here.”
“Mr. Speaker, protecting the certainty and integrity of private property rights remains a fundamental priority for our government. That is precisely why we advance all viable legal arguments to protect private property. We do not agree with the B.C. Supreme Court’s ruling, which is why the government appealed it back in September. Our government is fully committed to ensuring stability, certainty and confidence for Canadians who own property while we advance reconciliation. This matter is before the courts, where it should properly be addressed, not reduced to partisan rhetoric in this chamber.”
-
A repeated line
“That is why we advance all viable legal arguments to protect private property.”
Said 4 times by 2 members since May 4.
Every time it was said
Mr. Speaker, protecting the certainty and integrity of private property rights remains a fundamental priority for our government. That is precisely why we advance all viable legal arguments to protect private property. We do not agree with the B.C. Supreme Court’s ruling, which is why the government appealed it back in September. Our government is fully committed to ensuring stability, certainty and confidence for Canadians who own property while we advance reconciliation. This matter is before the courts, where it should properly be addressed, not reduced to partisan rhetoric in this chamber.