Discussion · Government Orders

Rebecca Alty Liberal

“The member opposite clearly has not read the Musqueam agreement. It does not mention private property because it does not deal with private property. Agreements only talk about the things they cover.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have many concerns about that statement, but I am wondering if the member opposite has read the Musqueam agreement. The Musqueam agreement does not reference private property because it does not deal with private property. Agreements do not reference everything they do not deal with. We only talk about things that the agreement is about. I am just wondering if the member opposite has read the Musqueam agreement.

No comments yet.

Comment rules