Discussion · Government Orders

Mark Gerretsen Liberal

“I used artificial intelligence to check this Conservative motion. The program said the motion ignores facts, cherry-picks numbers, and asks for things that make no sense. I want to know if the parliamentary secretary agrees with what the program said.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 38 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I know that Conservatives really like AI, because it seems like half of their speeches and questions are written by AI. I am a bit more skeptical. However, while I was sitting here listening to the member speak, I took a picture of the motion and asked AI, “What do you think of this motion?” This is the response I got: “This motion is built for maximum rhetorical punch, not factual or analytical strength. The motion collapses complex economic indicators into a simplistic, worse-than-the-G7 narrative, cherry-picks metrics without context and demands an impossible remedy that has no coherent policy meaning.” I am sure the Conservatives will say that this is our woke Liberal AI. Can the parliamentary secretary provide his comments on whether he thinks AI got it right this time?

No comments yet.

Comment rules