Discussion · Government Orders
Brad Vis Conservative
“My party tried to change this bill to keep tough, mandatory prison sentences for people who possess child pornography. Does the Bloc Québécois think the government is doing enough to punish these people?”
“Mr. Speaker, during the amendment stage, the Conservative Party put forward CPC‑13. It would have protected child pornography possession and access offences from charter challenges under sections 7 and 12 by enacting the notwithstanding clause while also preventing these offences from benefiting from the bill’s mandatory minimum safety valve. Does the Bloc Québécois believe that the government has done enough to prosecute individuals who look at child pornography in Canada?”
-
A repeated line
“While also preventing these offences from benefiting from the bill's mandatory minimum safety valve.”
Said 3 times by 2 members since June 3.
Every time it was said
Official Hansard
Mr. Speaker, during the amendment stage, the Conservative Party put forward CPC‑13. It would have protected child pornography possession and access offences from charter challenges under sections 7 and 12 by enacting the notwithstanding clause while also preventing these offences from benefiting from the bill’s mandatory minimum safety valve. Does the Bloc Québécois believe that the government has done enough to prosecute individuals who look at child pornography in Canada?