Discussion · Government Orders
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Québécois
“I will vote yes in the next Quebec referendum. The member knows we should not be debating this in the House of Commons.”
“Madam Speaker, it comes as no surprise that the member for Louis‑Saint‑Laurent—Akiawenhrahk will be voting “no” in the next referendum. I, on the other hand, will be voting “yes” in case anyone was wondering where my political interests lie. That said, what is even more ridiculous is that my colleague is asking me these types of questions when he knows full well that this is not a matter for debate in the House of Commons. However, I hope that my clear and straightforward answers have helped to reassure him.”
-
Reply to a debate question
Signal 0 of 100
Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
See full analysis
Official Hansard
Madam Speaker, it comes as no surprise that the member for Louis‑Saint‑Laurent—Akiawenhrahk will be voting “no” in the next referendum. I, on the other hand, will be voting “yes” in case anyone was wondering where my political interests lie. That said, what is even more ridiculous is that my colleague is asking me these types of questions when he knows full well that this is not a matter for debate in the House of Commons. However, I hope that my clear and straightforward answers have helped to reassure him.