Discussion · Government Orders
Alexis Deschênes Bloc Québécois
“This bill lets the government approve projects before checking their impact on the environment. That makes environmental reviews useless. If a review finds problems later, people might have to tear down work they already started. I want the Conservative leader to explain why he thinks this bill does not go far enough.”
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to hear from the leader of the official opposition about a very specific aspect of Bill C-39. I am referring to the government’s option to approve development projects even before an environmental assessment has been done. What purpose do environmental assessments serve? They serve to ensure that approved projects are good projects and not too environmentally harmful. Environmental assessments are supposed to come first, before the project. In some cases, Bill C-39 will pre-approve projects that are ready to get started. What happens if the assessment is negative? Proponents will be asked to come tear down any work already done. So much for predictability. In other words, these will be sham assessments, junk assessments. With that in mind, how can the leader of the official opposition say that this bill does not go far enough?”
Mr. Speaker, I would like to hear from the leader of the official opposition about a very specific aspect of Bill C-39. I am referring to the government’s option to approve development projects even before an environmental assessment has been done. What purpose do environmental assessments serve? They serve to ensure that approved projects are good projects and not too environmentally harmful. Environmental assessments are supposed to come first, before the project. In some cases, Bill C-39 will pre-approve projects that are ready to get started. What happens if the assessment is negative? Proponents will be asked to come tear down any work already done. So much for predictability. In other words, these will be sham assessments, junk assessments. With that in mind, how can the leader of the official opposition say that this bill does not go far enough?