Discussion · Government Orders

Ellis Ross Conservative

“This bill breaks the government's promises to Indigenous people and ignores court rulings. The courts say the government cannot pre-approve projects on lands where Indigenous rights might be hurt without consulting and accommodating them first. How will the government move forward if Indigenous groups do not agree to these land designations and activities?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member’s speech made significant mention of aboriginal rights and title without actually talking about aboriginal rights and title. There are so many clauses in this bill that affect rights and title and affect the promises made under UNDRIP by the government. One in particular is about enabling the designation of regions of national interest in areas such as energy corridors, transportation corridors and industrial corridors for the purposes of pre-approval. This is an interesting dilemma, because the courts have already said that we cannot have a pre-approval if we are aware of a decision that might infringe on rights and title. We must consult and accommodate. In this equation, we are asking two questions of rights and title: designation of land and the activity. How will the government proceed if it does not get consent on either of these activities?

No comments yet.

Comment rules