Discussion · Government Orders

Will Greaves Liberal

“Protecting water is important to my riding. This bill gives a one-year limit to decide on a project, not a guarantee to approve it. It still lets us reject bad projects. I want the member to say if that timeline is why she supports the bill.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, like the member, I represent an urban riding, but also a waterfront riding. It is one of the defining features of our communities and really underscores the tremendous importance to our constituents of ensuring the protection and preservation of our incredible freshwater resources in this country. That is why one of the pieces of this bill that I personally have found encouraging is the fact that it is not a one-year timeline to get to “yes”. It is a one-year timeline to get a determination on whether or not a project will go forward, and a timely period for proponents to know whether or not their projects will go ahead. I wonder if my hon. colleague could speak to whether or not that timeline, and the possibility of projects that are not in the public interest and would not serve my constituents nor hers, is a sound part of her support for this bill.

No comments yet.

Comment rules