Discussion · Government Orders

Don Davies NDP

“This bill has no safeguards to protect workers. It lets a minister end a strike on their own without any evidence. That violates the constitutional right to strike.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Respect 69 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “this member and the current government want to deflect attention from their own actions”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is funny that whenever this member and the current government want to deflect attention from their own actions, they point to someone else. It reminds me of my mother when I was in grade 3, when she asked me, “If Johnny jumped off the bridge, would you?” It is a ridiculous argument, but I want to address the misinformation embedded in the member’s question. There is not a single guardrail in the legislation, not one. We can read it. It says that it is through the sole opinion of the minister, taking into account any relevant consideration they want, that they may order the end of a strike. There is not a guardrail in the legislation. One person can end a strike based on no evidence whatsoever after a special mediator issues a report. The only misinformation is spread by the government in trying to tell Canadians that they put guardrails in this. There are no guardrails at all. This is a road map to violate Canadian workers’ constitutional right to strike, and that member knows it or he has not read the legislation.

No comments yet.

Comment rules