Discussion · Government Orders
Kevin Lamoureux Liberal
“This vote is about making life more affordable. For 18 months, Conservatives have voted against help for children, help for seniors, and tax cuts. They say they care about affordability, but they always vote against good programs.”
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to put this as simply as I can. At the end of the day, we have a motion about affordability. Consistently, over the last 18 months, since Canadians went to the polls and elected a new government with a new Prime Minister, we have witnessed Conservative after Conservative stand up and vote against affordability measures to support our children, support our seniors and cut taxes. These are the types of things the Conservatives have been voting against. They talk about affordability, but when it comes down to voting for good programs, they vote no. Why?”
-
Question or comment in debate
Clarity 37 of 100
Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.
See full analysis
Mr. Speaker, I would like to put this as simply as I can. At the end of the day, we have a motion about affordability. Consistently, over the last 18 months, since Canadians went to the polls and elected a new government with a new Prime Minister, we have witnessed Conservative after Conservative stand up and vote against affordability measures to support our children, support our seniors and cut taxes. These are the types of things the Conservatives have been voting against. They talk about affordability, but when it comes down to voting for good programs, they vote no. Why?