Discussion · Government Orders
Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Québécois
“A parliamentary committee said the government must respect provincial powers over youth protection when dealing with social media. I want the member to explain how this bill respects the powers of Quebec and the provinces, and how the government consulted with them.”
“Mr. Speaker, when the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage considered the issue, it adopted the following recommendation: That the Government of Canada, in addressing the effects of influencers and social media on children and adolescents—and while recognizing the jurisdiction and primacy of the provinces in matters relating to social services and youth protection—adopt an asymmetrical and flexible approach. I would like to ask my hon. colleague how, with Bill C-34, the government is taking an asymmetrical and flexible approach that recognizes the jurisdiction and primacy of Quebec and the provinces and how the government consulted and worked with Quebec and the provinces on this bill.”
-
A repeated line
“In addressing the effects of influencers and social media on children and adolescents.”
Said 4 times by 3 members since October 29.
Every time it was said
Mr. Speaker, when the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage considered the issue, it adopted the following recommendation: That the Government of Canada, in addressing the effects of influencers and social media on children and adolescents—and while recognizing the jurisdiction and primacy of the provinces in matters relating to social services and youth protection—adopt an asymmetrical and flexible approach. I would like to ask my hon. colleague how, with Bill C-34, the government is taking an asymmetrical and flexible approach that recognizes the jurisdiction and primacy of Quebec and the provinces and how the government consulted and worked with Quebec and the provinces on this bill.