The Environment

Question period focused on the environment, with the Bloc Québécois raising concerns about legislation affecting environmental assessments of pipelines and energy projects (referred to as Bill C-39). Patrick Bonin said the bill removes impact assessments for pipelines and would let the government set aside environmental laws for oil projects, calling it the worst bill for the environment in Canadian history, and argued the tariff situation was being used to justify it. Julie Dabrusin, for the government, said environmental regulations were not being weakened, that fighting climate change requires doubling the electricity grid and building clean energy projects such as those Hydro-Québec is pursuing, and invited the Bloc Québécois to support that plan.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Patrick Bonin, Repentigny

Bloc Québécois
“I oppose this bill. It removes environmental checks for pipelines and lets companies ignore environmental laws. It is the worst bill for the environment in Canadian history.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister just returned from the United Nations, where Secretary-General Guterres once again implored countries to phase out fossil fuels. Meanwhile, Canada introduced Bill C‑39, which gets rid of impact assessments for pipeline projects and makes it possible to permanently circumvent environmental laws. Greenpeace and Environmental Defence called it the “Bulldoze Nature” bill. Ecojustice called the bill catastrophic. No other bill in Canadian history has been worse for the environment. How can the Liberals sleep at night after defending such a bill?

Patrick Bonin, Repentigny

Bloc Québécois
“I oppose this bill. It removes a five-year limit and lets the government ignore environmental laws for oil projects forever. The Liberals are using the tariff war as an excuse to help oil companies and make the climate crisis worse.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would remind the House that, using Bill C-5, the Prime Minister gave himself the power to suspend environmental laws for his oil projects. Luckily, the Bloc Québécois managed to limit that abuse to five years. According to the Liberals, it was all in a bid to combat Donald Trump. Bill C-39 removes this five-year limit and allows the application of environmental laws to be suspended indefinitely. Why are the Liberals using the tariff war as a pretext to exacerbate the climate crisis and line the pockets of the oil companies?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 143

  1. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 111 statements
  2. Oral Questions Condolences 2 statements
  3. Oral Questions Taxation 7 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Public Safety 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 18 statements
  8. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Transportation 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Taxation 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 9 statements
  15. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 6 statements
  16. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 65 statements
  17. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Taxation 12 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act 14 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements