Analysis · Reply to a comment · beta

Garnett Genuis

Conservative on Government Orders 2026-04-27

123 words · 8 sentences · 10 clauses

Replying to John-Paul Danko (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, it is fascinating to watch members of the opposition perform in this place for their social media accounts, for their Conservative propaganda networks. That is what we are seeing here. This is just complete nonsense. It would be nice if, for once, the members opposite would actually work with the government, work together to do what Canadians are asking our government to do, which is to move forward with the critical issues at this time and not just perform for their propaganda networks.”

Statement grade

A+

Average 95 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 61%The ask 29%Promise 7%Positioning 2%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 63 wordsit is unsurprising to hear this member in particular complain about Conservative use of social media accounts. During the debate on Bill C-9, my colleague from London and I were doing a livestream, explaining to the public what was going on, ¹and this member came by, trying to offer some comment. We invited him to join the livestream, ²but he quickly ran away.³ The ask · 36 wordsIf he objects to how we use social media, I would like to give him another chance. He can join me for a livestream to discuss the bill and to share his thoughts with my followers. Promise · 9 wordsI will certainly happily share my thoughts with his. Claims · 12 wordsCanadians are frustrated by the attack on democracy that we are seeing. Positioning · 3 wordsCanadians deserve better.PositioningOff point

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 97

1 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Canadians deserve better.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 84

2 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the comment put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadians are frustrated by the attack on democracy that we are seeing.”About an attack on democracy, not the comment’s point about social media performance or Bill C-9.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadians deserve better.”A general claim about Canadians deserving better, tied to no point in the comment or to the bill.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“During the debate on Bill C-9, my colleague from London and I were doing a livestream”During the debate on Bill C-9, Garnett Genuis and his Conservative colleague from London, Ontario, hosted a livestream explaining the bill to the public.search
2“We invited him to join the livestream”During the Bill C-9 debate livestream, Genuis and his colleague invited John-Paul Danko to join the livestream.search
3“but he quickly ran away”John-Paul Danko left the livestream shortly after being invited to join it.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20