← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 69. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance.
30 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
76 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 5% Claims 76% Positioning 11% Reasoning 3% Anecdote 4% The ask 2%
Structure · 19 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 19 words I am pleased to rise today to speak to Government Motion No. 9 and the importance of parliamentary committees. Procedure Claims · 21 words As members of Parliament, we have been individually elected by our constituents to represent their interests in the House of Commons. Positioning · 83 words Not only do we individually represent the interests of our constituents, but together we represent the fabric of who Canadians are. We are a privileged minority of Canadians elected to this House, representing Canadians from every beautiful region of this vast and breathtaking country. We are standing here today to represent our constituents’ interests and as a representation of the will of our constituents. Every moment of our work as parliamentarians is ultimately aimed at good governance for the benefit of all Canadians. Positioning Claims · 16 words Much of this work is done in committees, which is the subject of Government Motion 9. Off point Procedure · 20 words Before I speak to the motion itself, it is important to highlight the role of committees in the Westminster system. Procedure Claims · 123 words One of the fundamental functions of members of Parliament is the development of legislation, and the crux of this work is done in committee. Committees are the venues that allow for and facilitate the detailed examination of not only legislation but also other policies and issues of interest to Canadians. Committees allow us to have focused and detailed discussions on what would be possible in the chamber, where debate is focused on the principle and scope of each bill. Committees are the place where we can review legislation, hear from witnesses and conduct clause-by-clause consideration of bills. It is through this process of legislative scrutiny that we can voice our views, ask experts questions, raise our concerns and debate proposals with each other. Positioning · 15 words Our ultimate, and I suggest shared, objective is to improve legislation when it is needed. Positioning Claims · 281 words It is this scrutiny and detailed examination in committees that not only strengthens accountability but also allows members to work together to find solutions to issues facing Canadians. That process and engagement builds trust with Canadians. It encourages open and transparent government. Participation in committees gives members the opportunity to scrutinize decisions and expenditures and monitor progress. Robust and constructive debate in committees is the means through which we arrive at solutions. Committees produce extensive and comprehensive reports, thereby adding to greater transparency for Canadians by ensuring public access to information about the government’s work. These studies help inform government policy and future legislative proposals. Committees are also incubators of non-partisan collaboration. They allow members from across parties to come together to address complex problems in a collaborative manner and foster consensus on difficult issues. Committees allow us to build camaraderie among members so we can bring forward our diverse perspectives as members from across the country, consider evidence-based insights and come together to advance the interests of Canadians. The discussions and insights that committees generate enrich our parliamentary process and our ability to work together. Further, the common thread to the work of all committees is that of hearing directly from Canadians, stakeholders and experts on a range of issues that are important to who we, together in the House of Commons, represent. With every committee study undertaken, through witnesses and briefs, we get to hear the diverse aspects and views on a particular subject, from business leaders to academics, scientists and Canadians from across this great country who are directly impacted by or have a strong interest in any one of the numerous subjects that the parliamentary committees study. Reasoning · 18 words This engagement of experts, stakeholders and citizens acts as a bridge between Parliament and the broader Canadian public. Claims · 89 words Committee work can also bring international perspectives on how we can best achieve our policy goals. Hearing about experiences from like-minded countries can help facilitate an exchange of ideas and ways to incorporate good ideas from abroad that can be implemented here in Canada. By bringing in the international perspective, we get to hear about emerging issues and opportunities to learn from the experience of other countries. Through this process, we learn about what worked well, what did not and how to avoid challenges that other countries have experienced. Anecdote · 33 words Every time I chair or participate in a committee meeting, I am struck by the extent to which witnesses want to share their expertise and lived experiences to inform the studies we undertake. Anecdote Claims · 61 words The fact that we hear from witnesses with varied and sometimes opposing perspectives helps us stay in touch with the diversity of Canadian perspectives. What Canadians think and their views on issues not only matter; they are important to informing us as members of Parliament. All of what we learn through parliamentary committees is taken into account as decisions are made. The ask · 14 words I encourage all Canadians to get involved in the work of our parliamentary committees. Positioning · 5 words It is democracy in action. Positioning Off point Procedure · 9 words Now I will turn to Government Motion No. 9. Procedure Claims · 82 words It is important to take a moment to note that the standing committees and special joint committees in this Parliament have mandates that are focused on the issues that are important to Canadians and to Canada. The reason they are called standing committees is that they should reflect the standings of the recognized parties in the House of Commons. In a Westminster parliamentary system such as ours, the composition of parliamentary committees is historically determined by reflecting the representation of political parties.1 Reasoning · 9 words This balances the need for representation with effective governance. Claims · 30 words The composition of committees should always reflect the standings in the House, and Government Motion No. 9 simply seeks to uphold and institute the principle that underpins our parliamentary system. Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×48 Positioning ×8 Procedure ×3 Anecdote
Off topic None of this speech addressed the bill under debate and what it would change.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 76
12 of 60 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I am pleased to rise today to speak to Government Motion No. 9 and the importance of parliamentary committees.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Not only do we individually represent the interests of our constituents,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but together we represent the fabric of who Canadians are.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are a privileged minority of Canadians elected to this House, representing Canadians from every beautiful region of this vast and breathtaking country.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are standing here today to represent our constituents’ interests and as a representation of the will of our constituents.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Every moment of our work as parliamentarians is ultimately aimed at good governance for the benefit of all Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Before I speak to the motion itself, it is important to highlight the role of committees in the Westminster system.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Our ultimate,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and I suggest shared, objective is to improve legislation when it is needed.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “Every time I chair or participate in a committee meeting, I am struck by the extent to which witnesses want to share their expertise and lived experiences to inform the studies we undertake.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is democracy in action.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Now I will turn to Government Motion No. 9.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 0
48 of 60 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As members of Parliament, we have been individually elected by our constituents to represent their interests in the House of Commons.” About members representing constituents, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Not only do we individually represent the interests of our constituents,” About members representing constituents, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but together we represent the fabric of who Canadians are.” About members collectively representing Canadians, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are a privileged minority of Canadians elected to this House, representing Canadians from every beautiful region of this vast and breathtaking country.” About members representing regions of Canada, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are standing here today to represent our constituents’ interests and as a representation of the will of our constituents.” About representing constituents’ will, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Every moment of our work as parliamentarians is ultimately aimed at good governance for the benefit of all Canadians.” About good governance generally, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Much of this work is done in committees,” About committee work, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which is the subject of Government Motion 9.” About Government Motion No. 9 as the subject, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “One of the fundamental functions of members of Parliament is the development of legislation,” About members developing legislation, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and the crux of this work is done in committee.” About legislative work in committee, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Committees are the venues that allow for and facilitate the detailed examination of not only legislation but also other policies and issues of interest to Canadians.” About committees examining legislation and policy, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Committees allow us to have focused and detailed discussions on what would be possible in the chamber,” About committee discussions versus chamber debate, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “where debate is focused on the principle and scope of each bill.” About chamber debate on bills’ principles, not this bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Committees are the place where we can review legislation, hear from witnesses and conduct clause-by-clause consideration of bills.” About committee review of legislation generally, not this bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is through this process of legislative scrutiny that we can voice our views, ask experts questions, raise our concerns and debate proposals with each other.” About legislative scrutiny in committee, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Our ultimate,” About a shared objective of improving legislation, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and I suggest shared, objective is to improve legislation when it is needed.” About improving legislation through committee work, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is this scrutiny and detailed examination in committees that not only strengthens accountability but also allows members to work together to find solutions to issues facing Canadians.” About committee scrutiny and accountability, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That process and engagement builds trust with Canadians.” About building trust through committee process, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It encourages open and transparent government.” About transparent government through committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Participation in committees gives members the opportunity to scrutinize decisions and expenditures and monitor progress.” About committee scrutiny of decisions and expenditures, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Robust and constructive debate in committees is the means through which we arrive at solutions.” About committee debate producing solutions, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Committees produce extensive and comprehensive reports, thereby adding to greater transparency for Canadians by ensuring public access to information about the government’s work.” About committee reports and transparency, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “These studies help inform government policy and future legislative proposals.” About committee studies informing policy, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Committees are also incubators of non-partisan collaboration.” About committees as venues for non-partisan collaboration, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They allow members from across parties to come together to address complex problems in a collaborative manner and foster consensus on difficult issues.” About cross-party collaboration in committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Committees allow us to build camaraderie among members so we can bring forward our diverse perspectives as members from across the country, consider evidence-based insights and come together to advance the interests of Canadians.” About camaraderie and diverse perspectives in committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The discussions and insights that committees generate enrich our parliamentary process and our ability to work together.” About committee discussions enriching the parliamentary process, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Further, the common thread to the work of all committees is that of hearing directly from Canadians, stakeholders and experts on a range of issues that are important to who we, together in the House of Commons, represent.” About committees hearing from Canadians and experts, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “With every committee study undertaken, through witnesses and briefs, we get to hear the diverse aspects and views on a particular subject, from business leaders to academics, scientists and Canadians from across this great country who are directly impacted by or have a strong interest in any one of the numerous subjects that the parliamentary committees study.” About committee witnesses and briefs generally, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This engagement of experts, stakeholders and citizens acts as a bridge between Parliament and the broader Canadian public.” About committee engagement bridging Parliament and the public, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Committee work can also bring international perspectives on how we can best achieve our policy goals.” About international perspectives in committee work, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Hearing about experiences from like-minded countries can help facilitate an exchange of ideas and ways to incorporate good ideas from abroad that can be implemented here in Canada.” About learning from like-minded countries, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “By bringing in the international perspective, we get to hear about emerging issues and opportunities to learn from the experience of other countries.” About hearing emerging issues from other countries, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Through this process, we learn about what worked well, what did not and how to avoid challenges that other countries have experienced.” About learning from other countries’ experiences, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Every time I chair or participate in a committee meeting, I am struck by the extent to which witnesses want to share their expertise and lived experiences to inform the studies we undertake.” About witnesses sharing expertise at committee meetings, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The fact that we hear from witnesses with varied and sometimes opposing perspectives helps us stay in touch with the diversity of Canadian perspectives.” About diverse witness perspectives at committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What Canadians think and their views on issues not only matter;” About Canadians’ views informing members, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “they are important to informing us as members of Parliament.” About Canadians’ views informing members, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “All of what we learn through parliamentary committees is taken into account as decisions are made.” About committee learning informing decisions, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I encourage all Canadians to get involved in the work of our parliamentary committees.” Encouraging Canadians to engage with committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is democracy in action.” About committee participation as democracy in action, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is important to take a moment to note that the standing committees and special joint committees in this Parliament have mandates that are focused on the issues that are important to Canadians and to Canada.” About committees’ mandates in this Parliament, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The reason they are called standing committees is that they should reflect the standings of the recognized parties in the House of Commons.” About why committees are called standing committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In a Westminster parliamentary system such as ours, the composition of parliamentary committees is historically determined by reflecting the representation of political parties.” About historical party composition of committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This balances the need for representation with effective governance.” About balancing representation and governance in committees, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The composition of committees should always reflect the standings in the House,” About committee composition reflecting House standings, not the bill’s hate offences.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and Government Motion No. 9 simply seeks to uphold and institute the principle that underpins our parliamentary system.” About Government Motion No. 9 upholding committee composition principles, not the bill’s hate offences.
Respect · 100
0 of 60 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 60 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the composition of parliamentary committees is historically determined by reflecting the representation of political parties” In Westminster parliamentary systems such as Canada’s, the composition of parliamentary committees has historically reflected the representation of political parties in the House. search