Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Gregor Robertson

Liberal on Finance 2026-04-29

61 words · 3 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Mark Strahl (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, these same old costly Liberals have continued their decade of credit card budgeting: more costs, more debt, more taxes, more of the same. In fact, the costly Liberal Prime Minister is now doubling the Trudeau deficit. He is literally doubling down on the failures of the past, failures that have delivered the worst housing, worst food inflation and worst economic growth in the G7. When will the Liberal Prime Minister end his costly credit card budgeting so Canadians can afford to put food on the table and keep a roof over their head?”

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 56%Claims 44%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 34 wordswhile the Conservatives may be mired in the last decade or two of failure, this government is focused on the future and delivering today.Off point This spring update has an incredible opportunity for young Canadians.Positioning Claims · 27 wordsUp to 100,000 Canadians will have access to training and support to build the affordable homes and community infrastructure that this country needs to build Canada strong.¹Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 41

2 of 5 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “while the Conservatives may be mired in the last decade or two of failure, this government is focused on the future and delivering today.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “This spring update has an incredible opportunity for young Canadians.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 28

3 of 5 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “while the Conservatives may be mired in the last decade or two of failure, this government is focused on the future and delivering today.”Praise of the government and criticism of the Conservatives, not an answer on ending credit card budgeting.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “This spring update has an incredible opportunity for young Canadians.”About the spring update’s opportunities for young Canadians, not when deficit spending will end.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “Up to 100,000 Canadians will have access to training and support to build the affordable homes and community infrastructure that this country needs to build Canada strong.”About training supports for homebuilding, not the deficit or credit card budgeting asked about.

Respect · 100

0 of 5 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 5 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Up to 100,000 Canadians will have access to training and support”Canada’s 2026 spring economic update says up to 100,000 Canadians will have access to training and support.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20