Jagsharan Singh Mahal

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 28 wordswhen Canadians hear that Parliament is debating a bill about weights and measurements, gas pumps, grocery scales and utility meters, they might assume this is a technical issue, ProcedureClaims · 37 wordsbut the bill touches something Canadians experience every day, the moment they pull up to the gas pump, the moment they scan their groceries and the moment their utility bill arrives at the end of the month. Reasoning · 29 wordsThe bill touches on trust, because at the most basic level, Canadians expect one simple thing: that if they pay for something, they should get what they paid for. Claims · 48 wordsBill S-3 promises to modernize Canada’s trade measurement laws, legislation that has not been touched meaningfully nor updated since the 1980s.¹ The bill would update how we regulate gas pumps, grocery scales, electricity and gas meters. It would introduce tools like sample-based inspections.² The bill presents reasonable objectives. Reasoning · 3 wordsModernization is necessary. Claims · 7 wordsTechnology has changed. The economy has changed. Reasoning · 6 wordsOur laws should reflect this reality. Positioning · 36 wordsConservatives believe in a fair marketplace. We believe in protecting consumers. We believe that when Canadians pay for a litre of gas, a kilogram of food or a unit of electricity, they should receive exactly that.Positioning Claims · 4 wordsWe support the bill, Procedure · 5 wordsbut there are some concerns.Procedure Positioning · 24 wordsWe are right to ask whether more government power means better outcomes for Canadians or just more bureaucracy. We support fairness. We support modernization, PositioningReasoning · 22 wordsbut we need to look closely to ensure that the bill does not come at the expense of accountability, transparency and affordability. The ask · 12 wordsThis is exactly why the bill needs to be studied in committee. Claims · 56 wordsCommittee is where Parliament does its real work, Partly on pointbut committees in this place are changing. Over the past number of days, serious concerns have been raised about how committees would be structured and controlled.Hidden agency Conservatives have been clear that if the government uses its forced, unelected majority to limit scrutiny, it could weaken transparency and accountability. Positioning · 14 wordsIf committees stop functioning as places of independent scrutiny, then where does accountability happen?Positioning Claims · 23 wordsI sit on the science and research committee.³ We have worked well together and addressed important issues because there has been a balance. Reasoning · 16 wordsWe can have critical views of current policy, as this is how we test these policies. Claims · 49 wordsLike many committees, that balance is at risk. There may be two new Liberal members. While I have no ill will toward the individuals, changes to committee composition would give government the power to shut down debate and critical thinking in the committee room.Off point The bill would expands powers. Reasoning · 63 wordsWe need to examine how these new powers would be used and whether Canadians would be properly protected. That only works if committee is allowed to be critical. The government cannot ask for more government powers while controlling the very committees meant to hold the powers accountable.Partly on point The bill is very important, because it is about ensuring Canadians get what they pay for, Positioning · 21 wordsbut Canadians across this country are asking a much bigger question: Can they afford what they are paying for at all?Positioning Claims · 131 wordsRight now, Canadians feel like they are paying more and getting less. Grocery prices have risen dramatically. Food inflation has reached levels not seen in decades. Gas prices have gone up. Utilities have gone up. At the same time, wages are not keeping pace, savings are shrinking and families are relying on credit just to get by. Families in my riding are having to choose between paying their bills and putting groceries on the table. Grocery prices are up 25% over just a few years.⁴ Prices are still rising year after year. Beef, vegetables and dairy continue to climb. The average family is expected to spend over $1,000 more for food this year alone.⁵ Families are cutting back. Parents are making difficult choices. Seniors on fixed incomes are stretching every dollar. Positioning · 7 wordsWhat is the government doing about this?PositioningOff point Procedure · 5 wordsCanadians got the answer yesterday.Procedure Claims · 28 wordsThe Prime Minister’s spring economic update unveiled what can only be described as a costly credit budget that would double the deficit left by the previous Liberal government.⁶ Reasoning · 13 wordsThat means more cost, more taxes, more debt and more inflation for Canadians. Claims · 42 wordsCanadians are now paying $59 billion a year just in interest on the debt.⁷ That is up by 10% in a single year.⁸ It is now more than we spend on health care transfers and more than the government collects in GST.Off point Procedure · 5 wordsMembers can think about that.Procedure Claims · 43 wordsEvery Canadian family is effectively paying about $3,400 a year just to service the federal debt.⁹ That is money not going into groceries, not going into housing and not going into savings. Yesterday alone, the government added another $37 billion in new spending.¹⁰ Positioning · 18 wordsAt a time when Canadians are struggling with affordability, the government is pouring more fuel on the fire, PositioningClaims · 52 wordsso when Canadians feel like everything costs more, they are right.Off point This bill would modernize the inspection framework at the gas pumps. The government regulates these pumps to make sure that people are getting the exact amount they are paying for. This would make sure that Canadians are not being ripped off, Positioning · 28 wordsbut Canadians are not thinking about inspection frameworks when they are standing there watching the numbers climb. They are thinking, “How much is this going to cost me?”PositioningPartly on point Claims · 41 wordsGas prices do not affect just commuters. They affect everything. They drive up the cost of food, goods and transportation. Those costs are built into the price of everything Canadians buy. That is why the Conservatives are calling for real relief. The ask · 41 wordsWe are saying to scrap the federal taxes on gas and diesel for the rest of the year, remove the fuel excise tax, remove the GST on gas and diesel, remove the industrial carbon tax and remove the fuel standard tax. Claims · 21 wordsThat would mean real relief of up to 25¢ per litre and over $1,200 of savings for a family this year.¹¹Off point Positioning · 20 wordsThe bigger issue is not just whether the pump is accurate; it is whether Canadians can afford to use it.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 21 wordsInstead of following our plan, the Prime Minister cut only a third of the taxes for a third of the time.¹²Off point Positioning · 15 wordsAgain, the Liberals care more about regulations and control than they do about Canadian wallets.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 5 wordsThis bill is about trust, Reasoning · 13 wordsbut trust is not built through regulations alone. Trust is built through outcomes. Claims · 28 wordsAt its core, Bill S-3 is about trust in the marketplace. It is about making sure that, when Canadians pay for something, they receive what they pay for. Positioning · 23 wordsCanadians deserve a marketplace that is fair. They also deserve a government that is transparent, restrained and focused on making life more affordable.PositioningPartly on point Promise · 24 wordsWe will support this bill moving forward. We will ask hard questions, push for accountability and work to ensure that the legislation serves Canadians.Vague promise