“Mr. Speaker, regarding Bill S‑3, I want to hear my colleague talk about the context in his province. At home in Quebec, we have Hydro-Québec and Énergir. In the new context of a majority government, we are going to see more than ever the government, in this federal system, try to interfere in Quebec’s jurisdictions and give itself more powers. The Bloc Québécois wants to make sure that Hydro‑Québec and Énergir are at least heard in committee. We want to ensure that Quebec’s jurisdictions are respected and that the minister refrains from interfering even more. What does my colleague think about our desire to ensure that Quebec’s jurisdictions are respected in this area?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 93 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 90 wordswhen it comes to provincial jurisdiction, we must respect it.For any bill that comes to the House and goes to committee, the committee should decide, based on its rationale and based on logic, why the bill should or should not be passed and what changes should or should not be made.Partly on pointAnswering the question, yes, any subject that comes under section 92 of the Constitution of Canada shall be left to the provinces, and anything that has a larger impact on the entire nation shall be dealt with accordingly.
