“Mr. Speaker, I am somewhat disappointed, as I said earlier, in the Conservative Party not recognizing the value of having a national wealth fund. I think of the expansion of the port of Montreal in the province of Quebec. There is so much potential for projects across Canada, in Quebec and all regions of the country. This gives Canadians an opportunity to potentially participate. It allows for the expansion of our economy, the creation of jobs and contribution to our GDP. The Conservatives’ approach is to get out of the way. That is all they want to do. I would suggest they are not thinking about building Canada strong. They are more concerned about the Conservative Party than they are about the interests of Canadians. Why will the Conservative Party not support what many—”
Statement grade
B+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 88. The grade is held to 83, 30 above Clarity.
83 / 100, held down by Clarity
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 76%Reasoning 24%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 51 wordsI would like to thank my colleague for his question because, once again, we have proof that what the Liberal government is doing is doubling and tripling the infrastructure.Unearned certaintyIt is adding more layers and more structures.We already have the Canada Infrastructure Bank, 1which is there to do the job.Reasoning · 16 wordsThe Liberals should be using the tools that are in place and continuing to build Canada.
