← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 94 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
83 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 77% The question 23%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 59 words the Prime Minister has doubled Trudeau’s deficits, 1 and now Canadians are lining up at food banks and are unable to afford groceries.2 Now the Liberals want to sell off national infrastructure and put the money into their sovereign debt fund.3 We have seen this before with the failed Infrastructure Bank, Unearned certainty which is losing money and is built on deficits.4 The question · 18 words Does this Prime Minister understand that his spending spree is leaving Canadians with more debt and higher costs?
At a glance
Lost points for Unearned certainty
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 83
1 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We have seen this before” The collective-witness formula asserts the precedent as common experience rather than pointing to any evidence.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the Prime Minister has doubled Trudeau’s deficits” The Prime Minister has doubled the federal deficits of the Trudeau government. search 2 “Canadians are lining up at food banks and are unable to afford groceries” Food bank use in Canada has risen to the point where Canadians are lining up at food banks because they cannot afford groceries. search 3 “the Liberals want to sell off national infrastructure and put the money into their sovereign debt fund” The Liberal government proposes to sell off national infrastructure and put the proceeds into a sovereign debt fund. search 4 “losing money and is built on deficits” The Canada Infrastructure Bank is losing money and was built on deficits. search
