← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 66. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance. 30 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
64 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 24% Claims 71% Procedure 5%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 6
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 11 words I think they want more, so let us give them more. Positioning Claims · 73 words There is 5 Wing Goose Bay, which is expected to create tens of thousands of jobs, with $8 billion; 1 Bay du Nord, with thousands of jobs and $14 billion; 2 Mersey River Wind project, with 200 construction jobs and $500 million; 3 Nova Scotia and New Brunswick intertie, with 600 jobs and $6 billion; 4 Port of Montreal’s Contrecoeur project, with 8,000 jobs and $1.2 billion; 5 and Nouveau Monde Graphite, with 1,000 jobs and $1.8 billion.6 Off point Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 5 words this is a long list. Procedure Positioning · 14 words Instead of obstructing, the members can get on board and help us build Canada. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×10 Positioning ×3 Procedure Didn't answer None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 64
4 of 14 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I think they want more,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “so let us give them more.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “this is a long list.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Instead of obstructing, the members can get on board and help us build Canada.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 0
10 of 14 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I think they want more,” A rhetorical lead-in to a list of projects, not touching food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so let us give them more.” A rhetorical lead-in to a list of projects, not touching food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There is 5 Wing Goose Bay,” About a military infrastructure project, not about making food more affordable.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which is expected to create tens of thousands of jobs, with $8 billion;” About a project’s jobs and spending figures, not about food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Bay du Nord, with thousands of jobs and $14 billion;” About an oil project’s jobs and value, not about food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Mersey River Wind project, with 200 construction jobs and $500 million;” About a wind project’s jobs and value, not about food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Nova Scotia and New Brunswick intertie, with 600 jobs and $6 billion;” About an electrical intertie project’s jobs and cost, not about food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Port of Montreal’s Contrecoeur project, with 8,000 jobs and $1.2 billion;” About a port project’s jobs and cost, not about food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and Nouveau Monde Graphite, with 1,000 jobs and $1.8 billion.” About a mining project’s jobs and value, not about food affordability.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Instead of obstructing, the members can get on board and help us build Canada.” An invitation to support building projects, not about making food more affordable.
Respect · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 6
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “which is expected to create tens of thousands of jobs, with $8 billion; ” The government’s April 2026 budget update projects 5 Wing Goose Bay will involve $8 billion and create tens of thousands of jobs. search 2 “Bay du Nord, with thousands of jobs and $14 billion” The government’s April 2026 budget update projects the Bay du Nord project will involve $14 billion and thousands of jobs. search 3 “Mersey River Wind project, with 200 construction jobs and $500 million” The government’s April 2026 budget update projects the Mersey River Wind project will involve $500 million and 200 construction jobs. search 4 “Nova Scotia and New Brunswick intertie, with 600 jobs and $6 billion” The government’s April 2026 budget update projects the Nova Scotia and New Brunswick intertie will involve $6 billion and 600 jobs. search 5 “Port of Montreal’s Contrecoeur project, with 8,000 jobs and $1.2 billion” The government’s April 2026 budget update projects the Port of Montreal’s Contrecoeur project will involve $1.2 billion and 8,000 jobs. search 6 “Nouveau Monde Graphite, with 1,000 jobs and $1.8 billion” The government’s April 2026 budget update projects the Nouveau Monde Graphite project will involve $1.8 billion and 1,000 jobs. search
