Analysis · Debate question · beta

Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Conservative on Military Justice System Modernization Act 2026-05-04

120 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 98 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 4%Claims 66%The question 30%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 5 wordsI am a bit confused.Positioning Claims · 79 wordsAt committee, there were a number of veterans who spoke and shared their heart-wrenching stories.¹ We heard time and time again the importance of survivors wanting choice. At committee, the Minister of National Defence said, of the members of the Canadian Armed Forces, that we have to be able to look them in the eye, ²and tell them that we have a well-run and transparent system, ³and that they can trust the system to help them when problems arise.⁴ The question · 36 wordsHow is denying survivors choice and forcing them into an overburdened civilian system that does not understand the realities of military service compatible with the minister’s promise of a transparent, well-run system that they can trust?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 94

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “I am a bit confused.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“At committee, there were a number of veterans who spoke”Veterans testified at committee during consideration of Bill C-11, the Military Justice System Modernization Act.search
2“we have to be able to look them in the eye,”At committee on Bill C-11, the Minister of National Defence said of members of the Canadian Armed Forces that ‘we have to be able to look them in the eye’.search
3“we have a well-run and transparent system,”At committee on Bill C-11, the Minister of National Defence said that Canada has ‘a well-run and transparent system’ for members of the Canadian Armed Forces.search
4“they can trust the system to help them when problems arise.”At committee on Bill C-11, the Minister of National Defence said that members of the Canadian Armed Forces ‘can trust the system to help them when problems arise’.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20